SELECT * FROM #__news_items WHERE id != 40 AND catid IN (2) AND state = 1 ORDER BY date desc

Newsroom

Caps on rent reviews permitted but collars unenforceable – Supreme Court (Vic) decision

Nine Dots Legal

01 • 04 • 25

Authors:
Catherine Outridge, and Ted Vlahos
Category: Property Law

Caps on rent reviews permitted but collars unenforceable – Supreme Court (Vic) decision

Caps on rent reviews permitted but collars unenforceable – Supreme Court (Vic) decision

The Retail Leases Act (RLA) provides that any provision which seeks to prevent or limit the extent that rent can be reduced upon a rent review (e.g. a “collar”) will be void and unenforceable. There is, however, no express prohibition on a lease provision which seeks to impose a “cap” on increases to rent.

The decision in ALDI Foods Pty Ltd v Northcote Shopping Centre Pty Ltd [2024] VSC 799 in the Victorian Supreme Court has now confirmed that a cap on rent review is not prohibited under the RLA.

Previous VCAT position

The Supreme Court’s decision overturns a previous decision of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) which found that a cap on rent reviews was void under section 35(2) of the RLA.

VCAT’s decision held that, as section 35(2) of the RLA provides that the basis or formula on which a rent review is to be made must be one method of review (for example, one of a fixed percentage increase, market rent review, increase by CPI), any secondary method or formula for rent review (i.e. the cap on rent increase) would be unenforceable.

Supreme Court decision

In ALDI Foods Pty Ltd v Northcote Shopping Centre Pty Ltd, the landlord (Northcote Shopping Centre Pty Ltd) sought to argue that a 6% cap on CPI reviews under the lease was void as the cap was a second method of review, in contravention of section 35(2) of the RLA.

The tenant (ALDI Foods Pty Ltd) instead argued that:

  • the cap was not void because there was no express prohibition in section 35(2) on caps on rent reviews;
  • where the bargain struck between the parties in the form of lease provisions did not directly conflict with the RLA, the Court should not interfere; and
  • as the RLA is a tenant-friendly and remedial form of legislation, holding that a cap on rent reviews was unenforceable would contravene the intention of the legislation by removing a protection in the lease in favour of the tenant.

The Court agreed with the tenant’s arguments and found that a cap on rent reviews is not prohibited by the RLA.

This decision gives greater certainty to parties in negotiating rent review mechanisms in future leases.

Please contact us if you have any queries about your rent review or your lease in general.

You may also be interested in...

Newsroom
Victorian Government significantly expands off-the-plan duty concession for limited time

Victorian Government significantly expands off-the-plan duty concession for limited time

A new off-the-plan concession will be available for contracts entered into from 21 October 2024, running for 12 months. This...

Property Law

24 • 10 • 24

If your commercial tenant has an option to renew a retail premises lease, make you’re your section 28 notice right

Does your commercial tenant have an option to renew a retail premises lease? If so, get your section 28 notice right!

If your commercial tenant has an option to renew a retail premise lease it’s important, as a landlord, that you make sure...

Property Law

09 • 09 • 24

What you need to know about the new Commercial and Industrial Property Tax Reform in Victoria

What you need to know about the new Commercial and Industrial Property Tax Reform in Victoria

The Victoria Commercial and Industrial Property Tax Reform Bill was introduced into the Victorian Parliament in March 2024....

Property Law, Tax Law

29 • 04 • 24